Activists hit plan to install waste-to-energy facility in Cebu

January 21, 2022

Pro-environment groups lambasted the proposal of Cebu City Mayor Michael Rama to install a waste-to-energy (WTE) facility as part of the city’s long-term strategy on disaster resilience. 

In a statement issued on Wednesday, the groups said the proposed project will “exacerbate the public health and the ecological crisis” caused by climate change and the pandemic. 

Lawyer Kristine Joy Argallon of the Philippine Earth Justice Center said setting up WTE facilities “is an extremely expensive and dirty solid waste management method that “will cause more harm to the environment.” 

Argallon said the city’s climate and post-disaster resilience plan “should be based on ecological and sustainable principles” such as investments on renewable energy.

On January 12, Mayor Rama presented his plans on strengthening the city’s disaster preparedness before the City Council following the onslaught of Typhoon Odette in December 2021. 

Rama said the city needs its own power plant that can supply at least 200 megawatts and a WTE facility to prevent power interruption every time a typhoon hits the province. 

He also proposed to install all public utilities, including power and communication lines, underground.

“It is imperative that we will already be pursuing that all utilities should be installed underground. It is imperative for the city to own a power plant if feasible so that we will no longer be dependent,” said Rama.

Lawyer Lievj Alimangohan of the EcoWaste Coalition said Cebu City will plunge into a heavy financial burden if it enters into an agreement with a WTE facility project proponent.

“Typical WTE contracts have decades-long terms and contain lock-in provisions that will bind the City to expensive and onerous obligations for a long time,” said Alimangohan. 

He said the city should focus on “a robust implementation of programs that focus on waste minimization, materials recovery and recycling” instead of engaging in “an unnecessary expenditure of public funds on a system that is dangerous to public health and the environment.”

Related Articles

Will climate become an ‘election issue’ in 2025?

Will climate become an ‘election issue’ in 2025?

Will 2025 finally be the year? The climate crisis has never been more relevant, from the halls of Congress to daily living. The impacts of extreme heat are increasingly being felt at the household level, from the suspension of classes to concerns about the supply of...

The biggest killers of Filipinos: Fossil fuels and vehicles

The biggest killers of Filipinos: Fossil fuels and vehicles

The reliance of the world economy on the burning of fossil fuels, oil, and gas continues to drive up global temperatures. The sweltering heat of the past three months is just a small indication of what it will be like in the years to come. Every year is hotter than...

Synodality and its Silences 

Synodality and its Silences 

Why the deafening silence? How can we not listen? Why are we not protesting? Who is accountable and how can we make them accountable? What do we need to do?

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This